Telenav · 2024–2025 Novo Mobile App UX & UI Design

Novo Mobile —
One app,
two journeys

Novo is a usage-based insurance app with two distinct entry points: active policyholders managing their coverage, and anyone who wants to Test Drive the app — see their safety score and potential savings before committing. I worked on both sides.

Early Churn
25% → <5%
Setup Completion
80%
App NPS
50+
App Store Rating
★ 4.5

Two ways
into Novo

Novo is a usage-based insurance app — but access to the actual insurance product is only available to active policyholders. Everyone else can use Test Drive mode: drive normally, see your safety score, and find out what kind of discount you'd qualify for before signing up for coverage.

This distinction shapes everything about the product design. Policyholders need to complete setup — upload documents, register their vehicle, grant permissions — before they can use what they're paying for. Test Drive users need to understand what they're getting and feel enough confidence to convert. Two completely different jobs to be done in one app.

I worked on both sides alongside a UX designer. Some features we built together; some I owned fully. The Document Upload feature — which had the most measurable impact on policyholder retention — was designed entirely by me.

Mode A
Policyholder

Active insurance customers. Must complete full setup to access coverage, score, and rewards.

Mode B
Test Drive

No policy required. Drive, get a safety score, see potential savings. Convert when ready.

The constraint

You can't see the insurance product without being a policyholder. That makes the onboarding experience critical — drop out before completing setup, and the product doesn't exist for you.

Two journeys,
side by side

Welcome

With policy · one car

Insurance

Driver Board

Billing

25% were leaving
in the first month

When policyholders signed up for Novo, a quarter of them cancelled within two to four weeks. Early churn at that scale had one clear cause: people weren't finishing setup. Uploading required documents, completing vehicle information, granting permissions — these steps were unclear, scattered, and easy to abandon.

Users who didn't complete setup couldn't access the product they were paying for. Users who couldn't access it left. The fix wasn't adding features — it was removing friction from the ones that already existed.

The number

25% of new policyholders cancelled within 2–4 weeks. Incomplete setup was the common thread.

% cancelled in 2–4 weeks by bind month cohort · Mar 2025 – Mar 2026

What changed
after it shipped

<5%
Early Churn
↓ from 25%
80%
Setup Completion Rate
50+
App NPS Score
4.5★
App Store Rating
Churn reversed in 4 weeks
Early cancellation — the product's most urgent metric — moved from critical to controlled through iterative UX improvements to the setup experience.
20pp reduction
Higher setup completion
More users reached full activation. Better completion meant better engagement, better data, and better outcomes downstream for both the product and the policyholder.
80% complete
Improved customer experience
NPS of 50+ reflects that users didn't just complete setup — they felt confident doing it. Clarity and feedback loops built trust at the most critical moment in the relationship.
NPS 50+
Strong app engagement
High App Store ratings and sustained engagement indicate that users who completed setup stayed active — validating the onboarding investment beyond the first week.
★ Highly rated

The feature
in action

Designed entirely by me. One of the features most directly tied to the churn reduction — making it easy for policyholders to submit required documents without dropping off.

What this work
actually taught me

The most interesting thing about this project is that the impact was real and measurable — which isn't always the case in product design. A 25% to under 5% churn reduction is the kind of number that shows up in board slides, and it came from making a document upload flow less confusing.

The feature that moved the needle wasn't a redesign of the scoring system or a new gamification mechanic. It was: can the user easily give us the documents we need, understand why, and feel confident it was done correctly? Getting that right required thinking carefully about the emotional state of someone who has just signed up for a new insurance product — motivated but uncertain, willing to comply but quick to give up if something feels broken.

The lesson

The feature that moved the number wasn't the most exciting one on the roadmap. It was the one that removed the most confusion.

Also in my work

Designing at
automotive scale

Beyond mobile — a decade of embedded UX across Ford, Lincoln, Audi, and Stellantis. Responsive in-car systems from 8" to 15". Hundreds of screens. One design language.

01
System thinking
Designing components and patterns that scale across OEM product lines — not one-off screens, but reusable systems built for variant complexity.
02
Responsive at scale
Adapting interfaces from 8" to 15" display configurations — maintaining hierarchy, usability, and brand fidelity across every screen size.
03
Complexity management
Hundreds of production screens adapted to updated OEM guidelines. Systematic, thorough, and uncompromising on execution quality.
04
Polished UX execution
Production-ready deliverables for embedded automotive contexts — where clarity, safety, and brand alignment are non-negotiable constraints.
OEM Partners Ford Lincoln Audi Stellantis